John Palmer, a developer and brand adviser, said it “feels like a bug” to call them stablecoins and that they should have a self-defined and non-reactionary name.
Originally posted on Cointelegraph.com News
‘Stablecoins’ are an outdated term from crypto’s early years: a16z
Categories
Trending
Recent Comments
- Edward Gallagher on US senators urge CFTC probe Polymarket over ‘deceptive marketing’
- Charlie Castillo on Charles Schwab to enter prediction markets with S&P 500 wagers: WSJ
- Phoenix Henderson on Hackers tried to backdoor Injective npm package to steal wallet keys
- Ash Lopez on Bitcoin teases $62K breakdown as analysis sees Micron earnings volatility next
- Fred Mitchell on DeFi protocol Carrot becomes first casualty of $285M Drift exploit
Recent Articles
coin
August 20, 2026
1 Comment
coin
August 19, 2026
1 Comment
2 thoughts on “‘Stablecoins’ are an outdated term from crypto’s early years: a16z”
Naming conventions really matter in tech, don’t they?
Words can be like arrows; precise yet sometimes misdirected. Names matter, especially in this evolving game.
Comments are closed.